Skip to content
The Dubious Disciple

Book Reviews and Theological Rants of a Liberal Christian

The Dubious Disciple

Book Reviews and Theological Rants of a Liberal Christian

Deuteronomy 21:15-17, God Breaks the Law

March 21, 2014

If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated: Then it shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated, which is indeed the firstborn: But he shall acknowledge the son of the hated for the firstborn, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his.

//This interesting law was apparently established to protect the true firstborn’s inheritance. The firstborn was to receive a double portion in his inheritance. Even if a man’s first son comes from a wife that he hates, he must give that son preference.

But doesn’t this precisely describe the situation with Abraham, Isaac and Ishmael? God tells Abraham to send the first-born Ishmael and his mother away into the desert, with nothing but a skin of water, and to give everything to Isaac instead.

In fact, how many more pairs of brothers can you think of where the firstborn is snubbed for a later child, with the favor of God? Here are some more non-firstborns who won God’s approval: Abel, Jacob, Gideon.

Indeed, both the priesthood (Eleazar, Ithamar, Levi) and the kingship of Israel (David, Solomon, Judah) are founded on non-firstborns.

Where did this law come from, if not even God pays it any mind?

Bible Commentary

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Comments (7)

  1. Aleta says:
    March 21, 2014 at 10:30 pm

    As so many things in the old testament, these examples are typical of us inheriting everlasting life through the second born (spirital life) with in us, not the first born natural.

  2. andrew says:
    March 22, 2014 at 9:41 am

    this is a wonderful set of of observations and questions. for purposes of my own understanding, what are your thoughts on this question: in the case of ishmael, is it possible that he did not inherit because hagar never became abraham’s ‘wife’?

    1. Name says:
      September 3, 2018 at 9:57 am

      Hagar did become his wife. Read the story. Sara ( later ) Sarah told Abraham to take her ( hagar) as his wife.

  3. Lee Harmon says:
    March 22, 2014 at 10:14 am

    That’s a great observation, Aleta.

    Andrew, that’s a tough question. There are jumbled stories of Isaac and Ishmael spliced together, but in a touching scene after Abraham dies, the two sons come together to bury their father. Perhaps all was made right in that day.

    1. andrew says:
      March 22, 2014 at 5:21 pm

      thx for this, lee. but in any of those ‘jumbled’ stories is hagar ever considered abraham’s wife? i’m thinking this has bearing on whether the narrative actually contradicts deut 21.15-17.

  4. Lee Harmon says:
    March 23, 2014 at 7:56 am

    oh, sorry, andrew. For some interesting speculation about that, see here:

    http://www.dubiousdisciple.com/2012/09/genesis-251-who-was-abrahams-second-wife.html

    1. andrew says:
      March 24, 2014 at 5:58 pm

      excellent – thanks for this link.

Comments are closed.

©2025 The Dubious Disciple | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes